20th European Spectrum Management Conference

The European Commission’s Digital Networks Act (DNA), expected to be released in Q4 2025, aims to propose solutions to improve market incentives to build the digital networks of the future, reduce burden and compliance costs, and improve digital connectivity for end-users by creating an integrated single market for connectivity and a more coordinated EU spectrum policy. Spectrum policy is set to be a major focus, with a likely push for greater harmonisation and coordination across member states, alongside an emphasis on long-term spectrum licenses to provide regulatory stability and encourage investment. While these measures could lead to more standardised and efficient spectrum use, aligning national policies remains complex due to differing national circumstances and telecom market structures. This session will explore the expected spectrum policy proposals within the DNA, assessing how they may build upon the existing regulatory framework to optimise spectrum value. It will also assess the potential impact on industry stakeholders and explore the implications for the roles and responsibilities of European policymakers and national authorities, respectively. It will look at the extent to which reform is needed in European spectrum policy and at how this can be best approached as part of the Digital Networks Act (DNA) to ensure a well-balanced and effective policy framework that supports Europe’s broader digital goals.

• To what extend is there a need to reform in European spectrum policy to incentivize and encourage investments in digital infrastructure? What is working well within the current policy framework, and what could be improved?
• What spectrum policy proposals are expected as part of the forthcoming Digital Networks Act (DNA), and to what extent can they address these areas for improvement?
• How would the proposed measures align with the broader European and national spectrum policy frameworks that are seen today?
• To what extent is increased harmonisation and coordination of spectrum policy across member states necessary?
• Is there an argument that certain spectrum management responsibilities be transferred to the EU level? What impact could this have, and what would be the potential benefits and challenges of such a shift?
• How can a balance be struck between greater alignment and the need to account for national differences in telecom markets across member states? 
• What impact could an extension of licence duration have in helping to promote business certainty and encourage investment in infrastructure development? To what extent should this be something that is mandated at a European or member state level?

Discussions across Europe are continuing on the future of the upper 6 GHz band (6425-7125 MHz), with CEPT being tasked by the European Commission to study the feasibility of a hybrid/shared approach. This session will look at the extent to which a hybrid approach in this way can be a viable ‘win-win’ solution and the challenges and obstacles that potentially stand in the way. With RSPG due to publish their recommendations on the future of the band just a day before this conference, it will look at the findings and outcomes of this and at how it fits with the broader discussions that are taking place at a European and member state level. It will discuss the factors that are likely to ultimately decide the approach that Europe takes to this key spectrum in the long term, and depending on whether a licenced, unlicenced or hybrid approach is selected, the measures that will then be required to ensure the long-term future of all the key stakeholders involved. 

• What different visions for the long-term future of the 6GHz bands are emerging in countries around Europe and beyond? What trends are emerging?
• With some countries (notably the UK) proposing a hybrid sharing solution in the band, and this also being studied at a CEPT level, could there still be the opportunity to find a ‘win-win’ situation?
• What are the key recommendations that have come out of the RSPG report, and how important could this be in developing a European approach? 
• To what extent is there still the possibility to deliver a coordinated approach to the band across Europe and Region 1?
• With diverging approaches and policies seen on a global level, what impact could this have on equipment availability, interoperability, and economies of scale? To what extent is a licensed and/or unlicensed ecosystem starting to emerge globally in the band?
• For countries considering allocating the upper 6 GHz for mobile, what is the expected timeline, and how will the band be structured?
• What are the challenges and opportunities in balancing the needs of mobile and Wi-Fi connectivity within the same band, and what different sharing scenarios are being considered to overcome these?
• What ultimately will be the approach that is likely to be taken in Europe, and what factors will influence this?

Mid-band frequencies have long been seen as a crucial part of the spectrum portfolio for a number of key users. In Europe, we are now at the stage where the majority of frequencies in the sub-6GHz midband frequency ranges have been allocated and brought to market. A number of key non-terrestrial and terrestrial users are seen across the bands, and in addition, the 3.8GHz to 4.2GHz band has been harmonised to provide spectrum for localised networks, offering connectivity to key vertical sectors. With these mid-band frequencies offering some of the most valuable bandwidth both for IMT and other users, it is vital that the bandwidth they contain is being used to its maximum potential. The session will look at the extent to which this is currently happening, at the way in which the technology and device ecosystem is developing across different bands, and at whether there are options that could be explored to further increase efficiency and value of these hugely important frequencies for the benefit of all.

• What is the current status of (sub 6GHz) mid-band spectrum allocation across Europe? How much of the allocated spectrum is accessible, has been awarded, and is actively being utilised?
• How is the ecosystem of mid-band technologies and devices advancing and evolving across the region? To what extent is a harmonised approach being seen, and how important is this to ensure the value of these key bands are maximised? 
• Whilst the 1500 MHz and 2300 MHz bands are identified globally for mobile broadband, in Europe, they are not that widely used. What are the reasons for this, and is it likely to change in the near future? 
• How successful have deployments of local networks been in the 3.8GHz – 4.2GHz band? Is this spectrum being used to its maximum efficiency, or could there be opportunities to look at other options?
• Is there an argument to explore the authorisation of higher power mobile devices above 3.8GHz? If so, how high could this authorisation go, and what will the impact of this be for incumbent users in the band?
• How can any coexistence challenges be managed between devices operating in this range and radio altimeters operating in adjacent C-band frequencies? Are current mitigation strategies sufficient to ensure aviation safety without unnecessarily limiting spectrum usage?
• How can it be ensured that key users beyond IMT, such as satellite and vertical users, also have efficient and equitable access to sufficient mid-band spectrum to meet their current and future requirements? 
• With an increased focus on D2D connectivity, to what extent could spectrum within these key mid-band frequencies provide a solution to meet these evolving needs? 
• To what degree is the potential of key mid-bands being maximised, and are there still ways they can be utilised more efficiently and effectively? Have we found the best use for the mid-band spectrum?

The 470-694 MHz (sub-700MHz) band is the core band for DTT broadcast services and for audio Programme Making and Special Events (PMSE). Both at a WRC and ITU level, decisions have been taken to protect broadcast services as the exclusive primary user in the band until at least 2030, but discussions have now turned to look at what then comes next – to 2030 and beyond. This session will discuss exactly that. Following a recent public consultation and workshop held on the issues, RSPG are launching their draft report ‘the future usage of sub – 700 MHz bands in the EU’ on the day before this event, and against this backdrop, this session will look at the long-term future of these key frequencies and of the key stakeholders that utilise them. 

• What key findings and conclusions have come out of the RSPG report on the future usage of sub – 700 MHz band? What might mean for the future shape of the band beyond 2030?
• What approaches to the band are being seen outside Europe, and are there any lessons that can be taken from these?
• What work has been done to consider the feasibility of IMT in the band alongside broadcast, PMSE, and other incumbent users? To what extent could this be a possibility?
• With the current regulatory regime allowing a secondary allocation for IMT in the 600MHz frequencies alongside broadcast as the primary user, what has this meant in practice? Have any countries taken advantage of this flexibility? 
• What is the long-term future of DTT across different European member states? To what extent is there likely to be a divergence in approaches, and how can this be handled at a European level to deliver a coordinated approach?
• In those countries that have a lower demand and use for terrestrial broadcasting, what plans could emerge to shrink or reorganise the spectrum available for DTT users, or maybe to even turn off DTT all together? 
• In this case, what would the impact be on the 600MHz and neighbouring bands, and of other key users such as PMSE and IMT? What are the necessary steps to start planning for such a potential switch-off, transition, or reallocation of spectrum?
• Is there an argument that any reorganisation of the bands should consider allocating dedicated spectrum for PMSE, and how could this work?
• At the US edition of this conference last year, FCC Chair Brendan Carr raised the possibility of also making the 500Mhz band available for mobile. Could this also be something to consider in Europe, or would there be too many challenges?
• What are the next steps more broadly to ensure the most efficient use of the sub-700MHz frequencies beyond 2030 and secure the future of all the key users that operate in it?

As connectivity demands continue to grow, spectrum sharing has become an increasingly important tool for optimizing limited resources. While Europe has traditionally taken a cautious approach compared to other regions, spectrum sharing is increasingly being seen across member states as a key strategy for maximising efficiency and meeting the needs of next-generation technologies. This session will explore how new regulatory approaches and innovative technological solutions are already shaping the landscape of spectrum sharing in Europe and explore how these developments could further accelerate shared solutions in the future. It will discuss the ongoing challenges associated with different sharing models, with a specific focus on mobile networks and the extent to which these can be part of a part of an efficient and scalable sharing solution. Finally, the discussion will assess the need for greater regional coordination and examine lessons from global best practices that could help shape Europe’s approach to spectrum sharing in the years ahead.

• How have thinking and approaches to sharing evolved in Europe over recent years, and what innovative sharing models and initiatives are now being seen across different bands?
• What impact are advancements in technologies already having on the feasibility of sharing, and what can be expected in the near future? 
• How important will sharing be in delivering increased efficiency as we look to meet the needs of 6G and other next generation technologies?
• What technical and economic challenges are seen with different sharing models, and how can they be addressed to ensure efficient implementation?
• What are the biggest technical and policy challenges in integrating mobile networks into shared spectrum frameworks? To what extent can these challenges be solved, and can mobile ever be truly part of an efficient and scalable sharing solution?
• How can the power of AI and machine learning be leveraged to increase spectrum efficiency in areas such as real-time spectrum monitoring, interference mitigation, and dynamic spectrum access?
• What lessons can be drawn from successful spectrum-sharing and efficiency strategies in other regions, and how can Europe adapt these models?
• Is there a need for a more coordinated approach to spectrum sharing across the region, or even a completely harmonised sharing regime? What benefits could this bring?

This year sees the 20th anniversary of this conference, and to mark this, this session will bring together 4 experts who all participated in the first ever European Spectrum Management Conference in 2005 to look back at how spectrum policy has evolved— or in some cases, remained consistent — over the past two decades, while also sharing their insights on what lies ahead.

• How have spectrum management and policy discussions evolved over the past 20 years, and which key issues have remained consistent throughout?
• Which initiatives have proven successful, and which have fallen short of the expectations originally placed on them?
• What enduring themes and priorities have defined the European Spectrum Management Conference over the past two decades?
• What can we expect from spectrum policy and technology developments over the next 20 years, and how can regulators and stakeholders best prepare for what’s ahead?

hosted by Broadcast Network Europe (BNE)

With WRC-27 on the horizon, discussions on Europe’s key priorities and regulatory strategies are taking shape. With discussions already underway, stakeholders are starting to outline their priorities, objectives, and strategies for the next cycle, and early indications of Europe’s position on critical agenda items are emerging. This session will look at these and at the areas in which consensus seems likely both within Europe and across Region 1, and where differences are being seen. It will explore the roles of key European stakeholders (CEPT, European Commission, national regulators, and industry stakeholders) and how stakeholders, in developing European plans, can come together to strengthen Europe’s position on key agenda items. It will discuss the initial outcomes of CEPT’s preparatory work, the lessons learnt from WRC-23, and the evolving landscape of spectrum harmonisation across the region. By examining emerging trends, potential challenges, and areas for greater coordination, the discussion will provide insights into how Europe can develop a cohesive and effective strategy for WRC-27.

• What are the early priorities emerging for Europe in the build-up for WRC-27, and what should be the primary objectives?
• In which areas and agenda items is a consensus emerging across Europe and the rest of Region 1, and where are there different positions?
• What are the respective roles and responsibilities of CEPT, the European Commission, national regulators, industry, and other key bodies in shaping Europe’s WRC-27 strategy? What interplay and coordination between these organisations is being seen, and is there anything that could be done to improve this?
• How can European stakeholders best coordinate their positions to present a unified voice on issues?
• What have been the key outcomes from initial CEPT preparatory meetings, and what roadmap is being developed?
• What lessons can be learnt from WRC-23, and how should these shape Europe’s strategy and engagement in the next cycle?
• Are trends being seen towards either increased or decreased coordination and harmonisation of spectrum policies across European countries? How important is it that harmonisation is achieved, and what role can WRC-27 play in helping to deliver this?

As the satellite communications landscape rapidly evolves, managing the coexistence of GSO (Geostationary Orbit) and NGSO (Non-Geostationary Orbit) systems—alongside the growing number of diverse NGSO constellations—presents an increasingly complex challenge. The need to ensure reliable, interference-free connectivity demands a regulatory and licensing framework that can adapt to dynamic satellite movements, varying power levels, and congested orbital and spectrum environments. This session will examine whether the current framework is equipped to support this transformation and explore both policy and technological solutions that can enable fair access, long-term sustainability, and coexistence in an increasingly crowded sky.

• What rules and safeguards are currently in place in Europe to manage interference between GSO and NGSO systems, and among competing NGSO constellations? Are they sufficient for today’s environment?
• How are key parameters—such as power limits and coordination thresholds—defined, and what role should regulators play in updating or refining these?
• What licensing models can protect incumbent users while enabling market entry, promoting sustainable growth, and ensuring efficient use of orbital and spectrum resources?
• Can fair coexistence of GSO and NGSO systems in the same bands be realistically achieved? What regulatory reforms might be needed to protect all users’ rights and investments?
• How are new technologies and multi-orbit business models reshaping the competitive landscape, and do they call for a more flexible or differentiated regulatory approach?
• What role should regulators play in setting EPFD limits, and how can coexistence between different satellite operators be better managed?
• What steps should be taken at the European level to coordinate satellite licensing approaches and align regulatory frameworks across borders?

The 2 GHz MSS band (1980–2010 MHz / 2170–2200 MHz), has been harmonised across the EU since 2007, with licences held by Inmarsat and EchoStar. These licences are however set to expire in May 2027, and policymakers must now decide how best to use this strategically important spectrum. A recent RSPG report underlined the need for a coordinated EU-level approach by mid-2025 to avoid market fragmentation and ensure clarity on future band segmentation and next steps. With this deadline now almost on us, this session will look at the options that are being considered and at the policy, regulatory and technical considerations set to shape the decision. 

• What is the current role of the 2 GHz band in the MSS ecosystem, and how have Inmarsat and EchoStar used their assignments to date?
• What are the potential future use cases for the band? Should it remain an MSS band or could other options be considered? What proposals are being put forward if so?
• How should regulators balance the need for business continuity with the goal of enabling greater competition and innovation in the band? What are the implications of maintaining the current band segmentation versus reconfiguring or opening the band to new users or technologies?
• To what extent could spectrum in the band be used to meet future need for D2D connectivity, and how could this work?
• What next steps are now needed at the EU and Member State levels to reach agreement on a future usage and procedural roadmap, and ensure arrangements are in place in a timely fashion?

Efforts are well underway in many countries across Europe to plan for the next generation of connectivity. As 5G-Advanced and standalone 5G networks continue to be rolled out, the focus is increasingly shifting towards 6G. While some countries are leading in the rollout of next-generation connectivity, others are at an earlier stage, raising questions about how to ensure a cohesive and forward-looking spectrum strategy. At the same time, careful planning is needed to balance the immediate demands of 5G-Advanced with the long-term requirements of 6G, ensuring that Europe remains at the forefront of global innovation. By considering the technical requirements for 6G spectrum, potential applications, and the regulatory frameworks for spectrum allocation in the region, the session will look to identify the most effective strategies to ensure that Europe is at the forefront of developments as we move towards 6G.

• What progress has been made in deploying 5G-Advanced and 5G standalone technologies across Europe?  Which are the countries leading the way in these developments? 
• How important is the continual rollout of these services, both to continue the evolution of 5G and also as the next step in the path towards 6G? 
• What do stakeholders across the region need to be doing now to develop a spectrum roadmap that puts them on a path to global leadership when it comes to 6G, whilst also considering the growing connectivity needs of 5G-Advanced in the shorter term?
• How can the needs for spectrum to meet the next generations of mobile connectivity be balanced with the needs of other future connectivity technologies to ensure the requirements of everyone are met?
• What are the key technical features and capabilities that should be prioritised in 6G standards? 
• What will the roadmap to 6G look like in terms of key milestones and development phases? What new capabilities can be expected, and when are they likely to be introduced? How significant will the cost be in realising 6G’s potential, and what strategies can help keep it at a sustainable level?
• How will artificial intelligence (AI) and other emerging technologies shape the evolution of 6G and the networks of the future more broadly?

Three bands have been identified to be studied for potential IMT identification ahead of WRC-27: 4400 – 4800 MHz; 7.125 – 8.5 GHz and 14.8 – 15.35 GHz. Among these, the 7.125–8.5 GHz range has emerged as the primary focus and is seen now by many as the leading candidate for a global 6G pioneer band, similar to the way that 3.5GHz was with 5G. Achieving this will not be simple, however – it is currently used extensively by a number of different users, including military, satellite, and earth exploration services.  This session will examine ongoing discussions surrounding the band, with a particular focus on the 7.125–7.25 GHz and 7.75–8.4 GHz segments, which are currently under study for WRC-27 in Region 1. It will assess existing usage, the feasibility of IMT coexistence with incumbent services, and the technical conditions and solutions that are being explored as possible options to facilitate shared access. Lastly, the discussion will explore how regulators can effectively balance IMT spectrum demands with those of other critical services, ensuring a sustainable and efficient use of the band to meet future connectivity needs.

• What usage is currently seen across Europe and more broadly in region 1 in the 7.125Ghz – 8.5GHz band, and particularly in the 2 potions that are being studied ahead of WRC-27 (7.125-7.25 GHz and 7.75-8.4 GHz)? 
• What are the key technical and regulatory challenges that would need to be overcome in order to introduce IMT services in the band, and how feasible could it be? What mechanisms may be available to do this?
• How can it be ensured that the needs of IMT are balanced with the needs of existing primary users in the bands? What is the appropriate balance for spectrum allocation to ensure that all technologies have access to the bandwidth they need?
• How can policymakers balance the growing demand for IMT spectrum with the need to maintain secure and resilient military communications, particularly in an era of increasing geopolitical tensions and evolving defence strategies?
• What work has begun on sharing and compatibility studies in the band, both as part of WRC-27 and more broadly?
• To what extent could any decision on the future of the 6GHz band in Europe affect any decision around the future of this neighbouring band?
• How likely is it that this band will become harmonised as the main pioneer band for 6G in Europe and beyond? If it does not, what other options may also come into the mix?